Doctors For Equal
Rights For Physical And Mental Pain
8409 Carlynn Dr.
Bethesda, MD
20817 alensalerian@gmail.com
dralensalerian.blogspot.com
Founding members Siobhan Reynolds Kevin Byers Vanessa Mullin Alen J Salerian
Founding members Siobhan Reynolds Kevin Byers Vanessa Mullin Alen J Salerian
February 9, 2015
Dear friends
Attached are two
peer-reviewed articles that suggest The DC Department of Health decision to
shut down the Salerian Center For Neuroscience And Pain was not in the best
public interest and possibly caused several fatalities.
17 case studies
offer evidence of the dangers associated with bureaucracy making clinical
decisions. Sensitive dependence of mental function on prefrontal cortex
introduces a new paradigm for psychiatry.
The traumas my family and I have endured in the process have
been overwhelming. I don't plan to practice psychiatry again. I hope by sharing
my pain I would spare other doctors from similar tragedies.
Respectfully
Alen J Salerian MD
Case Report
Case Studies of 17 Patients
Salerian AJ*
Salerian Centre For Neuroscience and Pain, USA
Journal of Case Reports and Studies Volume 2 |
Issue 5 ISSN: 2348-9820
Open Access
*Corresponding
author: Salerian AJ, Salerian Centre For Neuroscience and
Pain, 8409 Carlynn Dr., Bethesda, MD 20817, USA, E-mail: alensalerian@gmail.com
Citation: Salerian AJ (2015) Case Studies
of 17 Patients.. J Case Rep Stud 2(5): 506
Abstract
Background: Heightened risk of adverse events following opiate discontinuation has
been reported.
Findings: This retrospective review of 17 patients suggests an increased risk of
adverse events including premature death with opiate discontinuation long after
withdrawal stage. The results are consistent with previously reported yet not
fully understood – opiate associated neuro protective mechanism – against
premature death for some vulnerable subgroups.
Conclusion: For some vulnerable people termination of opiates – regardless of why or
how – may represent a heightened risk of premature death.
Keywords: Opiates; Addiction; Pain; Withdrawal; Premature death
Findings
This study suggests an increased risk of adverse
events including premature death following opiate discontinuation long after
withdrawal stage.
Case studies of 17 patients
Information
In general people with dual diagnosis – psychiatric
and substance use disorders – may represent a high risk of premature death
consistent with the study by Grant et al [1]. Kakko and colleagues reported 20%
death rate among patients taking buprenorphine versus 0% death in a control
group in one year [2]. There is also compelling neuroimaging evidence of
neurodegeneration and brain atrophy associated in chronic pain patients who are
often treated with opiates [3]. Risk of death associated with opioid treatment
or dependence has been a subject of controversy. The validity of opioids
related vital statistics due to recording errors has also been raised [4].
The focus of this study is narrow
To review clinical states of 17 patients in 12
months following discontinuation of treatment triggered by the temporary
closure of a treatment center. Prior to their discharge, 17 patients were
stable on opioids without any life-threatening medical conditions. No evidence
of potential suicidal behavior, overt signs of depression or functional
impairment were observed in medical records.
All patients had appropriate referrals for follow
up. For unknown reasons not all patients received follow-up treatment with opiates.
All patients were informed of potential risk of adverse events associated with
discontinuation of treatment.
Method
Medical records of 17 patients at the treatment
center were reviewed. Routine documentation included DSM-IV based diagnosis and
pain – mood assessment on a scale of 1 to 10 with 1 representing the worst and
10 representing the best response. This was the essential measure. Also
reviewed were follow-up medical records. Brief phone evaluations were completed
for patients who did not receive follow-up care. Vital statistics were obtained
from official documents and death notices. Opiates included oxycodone,
methadone, oxymophone, fentanyl.
Results
10 patients received follow-up care. 7 patients did
not receive follow-up care. Among 10 patients receiving follow-up care 1
patient was off opiates (Table 1).
The youngest was age 22 and the oldest age 57, 10
men and 7 women. The primary diagnosis of 12 patients was chronic pain versus 5
with dual diagnosis of pain, addiction or treatment resistant depression.
Annex Publishers | www.annexpublishers.com Volume 2
| Issue 5
Journal of Case Reports and Studies
2
Patients Age Race Gender
157AAF 222CM 337CM 433CF 557CM 620CM 750CM 821CF
937CF 1037CM
1145CF 12 46AA F 1350CM 1430CM 1545AAM 16 40AA F
1745CM
Follow up And opiates
NO YES YES YES NO YES NO NO YES NO YES NO YES YES
NO YES NO
Table 1: Demographics of 17 patients
Patients
who did not take opiates reported worsening of mood and pain scores. There were
two fatalities both receiving outpatient
treatment. 1 by suicide and 1 from postsurgical
complications. Review of two fatalities
Patient 1: Age 22, three months after
reduction of opiates while attending an outpatient methadone clinic, this
college student committed suicide. On the day of suicide he was evaluated in an
emergency room for depression and suicidality and referred back to the
methadone clinic.
Patient 2: This 57-year-old woman died of
postsurgical complications of exploratory surgery for abdominal pain 7 months
post termination of treatment. She was receiving care but her methadone was
discontinued.
A preliminary report 1 year post intervention
suicides among patients at the center may also merit special mention. Out of
1200 total patient population 398 patients were discharged. Among them, there
were 7 fatalities from suicides. This represented a 20 fold increase of
self-inflicted deaths (Table 2).
Patient
With opiates Mood-Pain Score
Without opiates Mood–Pain Score
1 5.9 2
.
2 6.5
.
3 6.3
47
5 6.2 2.5
6 6.8
7 5.9 2.5
8 7.1 3.1
9 6.6
10 7.5 3.2
11 6.3
12 6.5 2.5
13 6 14 7.2
15 6.1 2.5
16 6.6
17 6.3 2.7
Average 6.4 2.9
Table 2: Mood-Pain scores of 17 patients
with opiates Vs without opiates
Annex Publishers | www.annexpublishers.com
Volume 2 | Issue 5
3
Journal of Case Reports and Studies
Discussion
The retrospective nature and small sample size are
major limitations for this study. The findings are consistent with previously
published reports by Kakko and Grant of heightened risk of premature death
among people with discontinued opiate treatment [1,2].
Noteworthy are the 2 premature fatalities in a
small group of 17 patients within one year termination of opiate treatment. The
delayed occurrence of both fatalities – 3 and 7 months post termination is
consistent with the observation that for these two individuals opiates might
have been neuroprotective against premature death.
Conclusion
The review results are consistent with the safety
and efficacy of opiates for chronic pain, addiction and complex psychiatric
disorders. Healthcare professionals must be sensitized to the heightened risk
of premature death upon discontinuation of stable treatment with opiates.
References
1. Grant BF, Stinson FS, Dawson DA, Chou SP,
Prevalence and co-occurrence of substance use disorders and independent mood
and anxiety disorders: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on
Alcohol and Related Conditions. Arch Gen Psychiatry 61: 807-16.
2. Kakko J, Svanborg D K, Kreek MJ, Hellig M (2003)
1-year retention and social function after buprenorphine-assisted relapse
prevention treatment for heroin dependence in Sweden: a randomised,
placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 361: 662-8.
3. Apkarian AV, Sosa Y, Sonty S, Levy RM, Harden
RN, et al. (2004) Chronic back pain is associated with decreased prefrontal and
thalamic gray matter density. J Neurosci 24: 10410-5.
4. Webster LR, Dasgupta N
(2011) Obtaining adequate data to determine causes of opioid related overdose
deaths. Pain Med 2: S86-92.
Journal of Psychology & Clinical Psychiatry
J Psychol Clin
Psychiatry 2015, 2(1): 00053
Submit Manuscript | http://medcraveonline.com
Sensitive
Dependence of Mental Function on Prefrontal Cortex
Research Article
Volume 2 Issue 1 - 2015
Introduction
Compelling
data suggest higher mental functions, executive function, awareness,
consciousness, planning, strategic thinking, imagination and processing sensory
input are the domain of prefrontal cortex function and in particular Brodman
areas 8, 9, 10, 46 [1,2]. Recent studies have also suggested that the mediating
influence of prefrontal cortex function is crucial in depression and in
antidepressant strategies [3] is it possible that what is true for depression
may also be true for other psychiatric disorders? And if this is true, does
that suggest that prefrontal cortex is endowed with a unique mediating
influence of mood, normalcy and psychiatric illness? And does this suggest that
a small decline of prefrontal cortex influence may have large effects in brain
function and human behavior similar to the butterfly effect of complex systems?
Method
This
paper will review diverse examples of the mediating influence of prefrontal
cortex in normalcy and mental illness. Observations consistent with natural
laws in support of them ediating prefrontal cortex influence will be presented
(Table 1). Examples of diverse correlations between mental disorders and
decline of prefrontal cortex will also be shown under the following headings:
I. Phylogeny
II. Biology
III. Clinical observations
IV. Neuroimaging studies
Phylogeny supports the
mediating influence of prefrontal cortex function
The idea
that a brain region may enjoy greater influence over nervous system is partly
rooted in natural observations consistent with the biological hierarchy of
diverse living organisms [4-7] (Figure 1). A simple example is a logical one:
head rules body and tail. A second example is an extension of the first. Brain
rules peripheral nervous system. Of course head and body, brain and peripheral
nervous system relationships are complex and bidirectional within the
biological hierarchy of influence.
Governing influence of
prefrontal cortex is also consistent with its highest biological complexity and
evolutionary youthfulness (Nolte2008). Further, more over the last several
decades data have accumulated to suggest that relative brain size, cellular
complexity and division of labor of multicellular organisms are of crucial
importance for intelligence and in essence, phylogenetically the youngest
biological systems have been endowed with the highest complexity and with the
greatest influence [4-6].
Neurophysiology supports the
mediating influence of
No comments:
Post a Comment